Abstract
Background: Ancient
Ayurveda seers presented the knowledge in coded
language, in the form of Sutras (verses).
These verses are characterized by Padairalpam, Matimbuddhwa,
i.e. having few words with concealed meaning with larger applications which can
be explored with the help of Sanskrit grammar. Sometimes, just translation of
the original verses might not convey the authentic and primary aim of the
author as it depends on various factors such as the context, time and place.
For this purpose, various commentators have adopted the methodology of
integrating Nyayas (maxims) in
their respective commentaries. Shringagrahika
Nyaya (SGN) also belongs to the same category as it has been mentioned in several contexts in Chakrapani's Ayurveda Dipika (AD) commentary on Charaka Samhita. It is the maxim of seizing the ox by its horns. The present work is an attempt to explore the different contexts of SGN in AD commentary. Aim
and Objective: To explore the significance of SGN in understanding
Charaka Samhita in context to AD commentary of Chakrapani. Materials
and Methods: Original text of Charaka Samhita along with Chakrapani's commentary, other available translations and published articles in peer-reviewed journals, published books and subject-related material available online have been thoroughly screened, compiled, organized and described in a systematic manner. Observations: Thorough screening of AD
commentary of Charaka Samhita revealed that SGN has been mentioned in 12
different contexts out of which some are in positive and some are in negative
sense. In a group of similar objects to indicate a particular one, this maxim
has been used. Conclusion: To get authentic apprehension of
Ayurvedic treatises, the knowledge of SGN is essential for the physicians,
especially for better understanding of Charaka Samhita as well as successful
implementation of fundamental concepts for the management of various disease
conditions.
2.
Introduction
Acharya Charaka has enlisted three methods to get
profound knowledge from Ayurvedic treatises, viz., Adhyayana (study), Adhyapana
(teaching) and Tadvidyasambhasha (scholarly discussion),[1] whereas Acharya Sushruta has quoted four
factors or qualities which enhance the intelligence and retention power,
viz., Satatadhyayana (constant study), Vada (discussion), Paratantravalokanam (studying
other branches of science) and Tadvidhyaacharyaseva (following
the learned preceptors in the respective branches of knowledge).[2] Thus, utmost importance is given
for Adhyayana (study) which is not an easy task as the treasure of Ayurvedic knowledge is encrypted in the form of verses characterized by 'Padairalpam Matimbuddhwa' (larger application
with minimal words).[3]
It can be explored with the help of Sanskrit
grammar which comprises Shabdartha (meanings), Sandhi (conjunctions), Samasa (compounds), Vibhaktipratyaya (cases)
and Alankara (figure of speech). Sometimes, mere translation
of the original verse may not give exact idea of the author as it depends upon
various factors such as the context, time and place etc. To overcome this,
various maxims have been brought into limelight by the different commentators.
Maxim is a brief statement that contains a
little piece of wisdom or a general rule of behavior which can be tricky.[4] The defining characteristic of a maxim is its pithy ā that is, it contains deep meaning in just a few words (nugget of words). Maxims are also known as a type of proverb, saying, adage, sententia or precept. Maxims are nearly the same as aphorisms. The only difference is that maxims are often straightforward whereas aphorisms tend to use a metaphor; maxims may or may not do this.
In classical rhetoric, maxims were regarded as
formulaic ways of conveying the common wisdom to people.[5] Many of these though based on stories or
incidents that might have occurred in the past are equally relevant even till
date. Maxim acts as a mathematical formula or a tool to derive the exact
meaning of the context and thereby helps to reach the original intention of the
author which will be helpful for the better understanding of the treatises. Even
though maxims are sagacious, they not only enhance the text or literature but
also provide scholastic blush to it.[6]
Based on the existence, they can be categorized
into two types, viz., Laukika (conventional) Nyayas and Shastriya (classical) Nyayas. Laukika
Nyayas are used in the day-to-day life that strengthens the
conversation whereas Shastriya Nyayas are helpful to beautify
and aid in better understanding of the literature.[7]
In Ayurvedic literature, these maxims are used
in two ways, viz., maxims in original verse and maxims in commentary. Shringagrahika
Nyaya (SGN) is traced in the commentary and it means holding the horn of a
cow or ox to indicate it, particularly from others in a herd. In a herd cows,
the best way to indicate a specific cow is, by holding its horn only. The main
intention behind this Nyaya is to specify a particular thing
in a group of similar ones.
Aims and objectives -
a. To find out the various contexts of SGN in Chakrapani's Ayurved Dipika commentary of Charaka Samhita
b. To explore the significance and necessity of SGN in those particular
contexts.
3
Materials and Methods
For the present review study, original text of Chakrapani's AD commentary of Charaka Samhita edited by Yadavji Trikamji Acharya was thoroughly screened and other available translations in various languages, published articles in peer-reviewed journals, published books and other subject-related material available online were referred to compile, analyze, organize and describe the different contexts of SGN in a systematic manner.
Observations
SGN has several explanations. The word 'Shringa' has two meanings in general, viz., Shringa and Shikhara.[8] In Sanskrit rhetoric, 'Shringa' word has been used as Parvata Shringa, Pashu Shringa,
and Vishaya Shringa.[9] Parvata Shringa means 'the top of the mountain' or 'apex of the hill' or 'crest of mountain (high priority);' Pashu Shringa means 'horn of the animal.' In general, when it is necessary to get control over a mad bull, the best way to hold it, by its horns only. Vishaya Shringa stands for Pradhanarupa and Mukhyarupa
Vishaya (main or important subject). Hence, 'Shringagrahika' means to get control over a particular thing or subject by holding a part of it to gain its entirety. In a group of similar objects to denote or indicate a particular one, this maxim has been used. Keeping all these views in mind, after the thorough screening of entire Ayurved Dipika commentary altogether 12 contexts were traced; out of which three are in Sutra Sthana, one
is in Nidana Sthana, one is in Vimana Sthana, two are
in Sharira Sthana, one is in Indriya Sthana and
four are in Chikitsa Sthana. No references have been found in
original text. These are described sequentially as follows:
Context 1
In Shadvirechanashatashritiya Adhyaya, after
the description of 50 Mahakashayas (classification of drugs), while concluding the chapter, it has been mentioned that 500 drugs have been put together into 50 (Mahakashayas) and they have been described by
definitions or indications (Lakshana) and illustrations (Udaharana).
Five hundred drugs (when they are counted as one by one or as individual) are grouped
into fifty Mahakashaya (Sub-groups) on the basis of a specific
character, i.e., similarity in their therapeutic action.
In this context, Chakrapanivisualized the
situation with the help of SGN as in which to indicate a cow from a cattle
group. Similarly, the total drugs in 50 subgroups are 500 in number when they
are counted individually like holding a horn of a cow in SGN. Here SGN is used
in a positive perspective to justify the present context.[10] Positive perspective means where there
is a specific description provided by the author in original verse and is
justified by the commentator with the incorporation of SGN. Hence, in this
context, the SGN has been used as an example or illustration to explain it in a
lucid manner.
Context 2
In Swedadhyaya, while instructing
about the pre- and post-managements of sudation, it is stated that after proper
oleation, a person should be administered sudation. When duly fomented, he/she
should be kept on wholesome diet. After sudation, person should abstain from
exercise. The details of the wholesome diet are not specified in the original
verses. Acharya Chakrapani in his commentary has quoted that after proper
sudation, a patient must follow wholesome diet or Samsarjana Krama.
As per SGN, details of the wholesome diet are not specified here; in this
context, all such diets that are responsible for the alleviation of Pitta are
to be considered as wholesome to counteract Pitta Dosha which
is aggravated during sudation.[11]
The reason behind non-specification of Pitta-alleviating
diet articles is to avoid unnecessary expansion of text and repetitions as
delineating each Pittahara Dravya (Pitta pacifying
drugs or diet) by its name is practically lengthy as well as impossible. Thus,
the context is made more comprehensive by incorporating SGN in a negative
perspective. On contrary to positive perspective, when there is no specific
description or vivid explanation of the context in the original verse and is
justified by following SGN, then the context comes under negative perspective.
Context 3
In Annapanavidhi Adhyaya, after the
brief description of various types of diets and drinks at one place, it is
stated that only such types of diets and drinks are taken into consideration
which are most commonly used by people. It is even impractical to enumerate all
the drugs by their names as it is said in the previous chapter, i.e., Atreyabhadrakapyiyam, 'that there is no single substance in the universe which cannot be used as Aushadha (drug).' Properties of the drugs which are not mentioned here have to be understood by considering their geographical region.
It is opined that properties of some selected
drugs pertained to Anna (diets) and Pana (drinks),
which are very commonly used are only described and those are not used commonly
are not described in this chapter. The rationality behind this description has
been justified and made clear by incorporating SGN in both the dimensions,
i.e., positively and negatively to avoid unnecessary vastness of the treatise.
The properties of such drugs which are not mentioned here can be determined by
the predominance of respective Mahabhuta (physical element) in
them.[12]
Context 4
In Unmada Nidanam Adhyaya, during the
description of Bhutonmada (a type of insanity caused by
external factors) and its prognosis, it is stated that Bhutonmada is
caused by the agents with three objectives, viz. Himsa (violence
or to inflict injury), Rati (affection/love/pleasure)
and Abhyarchana (pay obeisance to Gods). The intention of the
agent can be determined by the cardinal symptoms in the patient. When the
intention of the afflicted agent is violence, then the patient behaves
violently, for example, jumps into fire, drowns into water, falls into a pit,
strikes himself with weapons, whips, sticks, brickbats, his own fist, etc. He
may try to kill himself. Among these three Bhutonmadas, if the
intention of the agent is violence, then that Unmada is
incurable whereas remaining two are curable.
Acharya Chakrapani has commented that gods and
others do not enter into the body of patients directly. Only their subordinates
possessing identical nature affect the patient to cause respective Bhutonmada. After reading the present original verse, a doubt arises in reader's mind that what is the rationality behind the specific description about only the characters of Bhutonmada caused by violence? This has been justified by incorporating SGN as it is provided for the sake of physician's knowledge because the signs and symptoms of this particular Bhutonmada are
so violent that the patient kills himself. Hence, there is an urgent need to
identify this condition, protect the patient and educate the attendants of the
patient that the condition is incurable. Thus, making it the most important
amongst the three types of Bhutonmada, which has been made clear by
the commentator.[13]
Context 5
In Rasa Vimanam Adhyaya, after the
comprehensive description of six tastes along with their effects on Dosha,
three specific substances were explained, viz., Taila (oil), Sarpi (ghee)
and Madhu (honey) which alleviate Vata, Pitta and Kapha
Dosha, respectively. Among all the alleviating substances for Tridosha,
the reason behind specific description of these three substances is because
they are best of their kind. This pinpoint description has been substantiated
based on SGN in positive aspect.[14] Author has delineated the qualities of
each one of them individually in further verses of the same chapter.
Context 6
In Mahatigarbhavakranti Shariram Adhyaya,
it is stated that when the ovum and uterus of a female are afflicted by the
aggravated Dosha (due to excessive indulgence in the diet and
lifestyle provoking them) and when such woman conceives then one or many organs
of the fetus derived from the maternal source, viz., skin and blood, get
deformed. When the part of the ovum of the mother is responsible for the
production of uterus is excessively vitiated, then she gives birth to Vandhya-
an infertile female. When the part of the ovum which is responsible for the
production of uterus is excessively vitiated, then she gives birth to a Putipraja (the
female, who delivers dead fetus).
When the fractions of the ovum, which is
responsible for the production of uterus as well as the secondary sexual
characters such as breast, genital organs, pubic hair, and mustache-beard in
the ovum of the mother get excessively vitiated, then she gives birth to
a Varta (a child who is not completely female but only
possessing the feminine characteristics excessively). Here, only three
deformities of a progeny (female child) are described. However, there can be
many other such deformities which are left for the Yukti (logic)
of a physician.[15] The specific description about the three
deformities, viz. Vandhya, Putipraja and Varta is
rationalized by the integration of SGN in positive way as they are the most
important and might be considered as examples to ascertain various other
deformities of female progeny.
Context 7
In Shariravichaya Shariram, Acharya
Charaka has enumerated 20 Gunas (attributes) of Sharira
Dhatus (body tissues) which account for their increasing or decreasing
nature, viz., Guru (heavy), Laghu (light), Shita (cold), Ushna (hot), Snigdha (unctuous), Ruksha (dry), Manda (slow
or dull), Tikshna (quick or fast), Sthira (immobile), Sara (mobile), Mridu (soft), Kathina (hard), Vishada (clear
or shiny), Picchila (mucilaginous or cloudy), Shlakshna (smooth), Khara (rough), Sukshma (micro
or subtle), Sthula (macro or gross), Sandra (dense)
and Drava (liquid). It is also stated that with continuous
intake of heavy food preparations, the body tissues that are heavy get
increased and light ones get reduced. In the same way, all body tissues get
increased by the continuous intake of identical food substances and vice versa.
Hence, with continuous intake of Mamsa (meat), there is a
comparative increase of muscle tissue; simultaneously, there is increase in
respective body tissues due to similar kind of food intake. Here the author has
emphasized only on the therapeutic actions of Guru and Laghu
Gunas because they are explained as examples to understand the
therapeutic actions of other remaining attributes accordingly. The pairs of
other physical attributes are not described because it leads to unnecessary
expansion of the text as well as loss of comprehensiveness of the text. Hence,
the present context has been justified by SGN in a positive manner.[16]
Context 8
In Indriyanikamindriyam Adhyaya, it
is stated that if a patient perceives the sky as something solid or like the
earth and the earth as something void or like the sky, he will surely die as
both these symptoms are inauspicious or indicative of imminent death. The need
for depicting specifically the symptoms of imminent death in regards to vision
is not only due to their prominence but also eyes being the most important
amongst the five sense organs. Thus, these citations of illustrations pertained
to Chakshurindriya (sense organ of vision) are authenticated
by adopting SGN in a positive manner.[17]
Context 9
In Rajayakshma Chikitsitam, three
types of Rajayakshma based on the symptomatology, viz., Ekadasharupa (eleven
symptoms), Shadrupa (six symptoms) and Trirupa (three
symptoms) are mentioned. Eleven symptoms of Rajayakshma is a
conglomeration of Kasa (cough), Ansatapa (burning
sensation on the shoulders), Vaiswarya (impairment of the
voice), Jwara (fever), Parshwashula (pain in the sides of chest), Shiroruja (headache), Raktachhardana (hemoptysis), Kaphachhardana (spitting
of phlegm), Shwasa (dyspnea), Varchagada (diarrhea)
and Aruchi (anorexia). Six symptoms of Rajayakshma consist
of Kasa, Jwara, Parshwashula, Vaiswarya, Varchagada and Aruchi.
In this context, author did not emphasize or
enlist the symptoms of Trirupa Rajayakshma. This context is made
clear by the incorporation of SGN. Trirupa Rajayakshmameans any three
symptoms of Ekadasha Rupa Rajayakshma may present in the
patient. Hence, the detailed description about any three symptoms of Ekadasha
Rupa Rajayakshma is not provided. Hence, Acharya Chakrapani has
clarified that by following SGN in a negative aspect author has not mentioned
the specific three symptoms of Trirupa Rajayakshma.[18]
Context 10
In Vatavyadhi Chikitsitam, the
ailments which require careful treatment viz. Sandhichyuti (dislocation
of joints), Hanustambha (lock-jaw), Kunchana (contracture), Kubjatva (hunch-back), Arditavata (facial
paralysis), Pakshaghata (hemiplegia), Angasamshosha (atrophy
of limbs), Pangutwa (inability to walk due to muscular
dystrophy), Khudavata (affliction of small joint by Vata), Stambhana (stiffness)
and Adhyavata (stiffness of lower limbs) and Asthi-majjagatavataroga (diseases
located in bone and bone-marrow) have been described. These diseases can be
treated under special circumstances only if they have been recently originated,
if the patient is strong and is free from any complications.
In the present context, the list of such
complications pertaining to incurable Vata diseases is not mentioned by the author as it will be explained in the further verses of the same chapter. Here SGN is used in a negative manner to justify the word 'Nirupadravan' to prevent the text from repetitions, vastness as well as to make it more precise. It is difficult to enumerate the list of complications due to their innumerability as it varies according to disease condition.[19] This may be a reason, that the author
indirectly advices physician to be more cautious and think logically.
Context 11
In Yonivyapat Chikitsitam, while
describing the dose of medicine it is stated that a little quantity of water
cannot abolish or eradicate the fire. In the same way, Aushadha (medicine)
in a small quantity cannot cure a disease. The way in which over irrigation is
harmful for the crops, similarly medicine in excess quantity is also harmful
for the patient. However, the specific quantity of medicine is not mentioned
here.
Hence, a physician must examine the strength of
the patient carefully before administration of any medicine as well as
therapeutic measures, and it should be neither too excess nor too less and the
dose should be in Madhyama Pramana (moderate or medium). This
is made clear with the help of SGN in negative way that the dosage strictly
depends upon several factors such as the intensity, morbidity of involved Dosha and
the strength of an individual. It is difficult to mention the dosage of a drug
or therapy according to each and every condition.[20] The same concept has been mentioned
in Rogabhishagjitiyam chapter of Vimana Sthana.[21]
Context 12
In Yonivyapat Chikitsitam, during the
description of Satmya (wholesomeness), SGN is traced out. It
is stated that an unwholesome item (food or regimen) becomes Satmya (wholesome)
to a person due to its Auchitya (habitual intake) or the
nature of Desha (place or habitat), the immediate and
incomplete withdrawal of such item even though it is unwholesome does not give
comfort to an individual. Different types of habituation to different
geographical regions are enlisted by Acharya Charakaas given in [Table 1].
It is also stated that the medicine has to be
administered for these people along with their habitual or wholesome foods and
drinks. The wholesome ingredient provides instantaneous strength and they do
not cause any harmful effect even if administered in excess quantity. In this
context, Charakadid not specify about Purusha Satmyata(wholesome
food and regimen as per individual). Chakrapani in his commentary made this
context lucid by the integration of SGN in negative aspect and defined Purusha
Satmyata (wholesomeness as per individual) as 'the qualities of food and regimen that are opposite to their geographical region and it may not be fixed and also differs from individual to individual'.[22] Hence, its specific examples were not
provided here. Moreover, the same concept has been made clear in Tasyashitiyam
Adhyaya.[23]
Table 1: List
of wholesome diet and regimen in different geographical regions
4
Discussion
Since antiquity, in Sanskrit rhetoric, lots of
maxims have been utilized in different contexts to magnify their works. Based
on the existence, they can be divided into two categories, viz., Nyayas in Mula
Sutra (maxims in original verses) and Nyayas in Vyakhyana (maxims
in commentary). The present one, i.e. SGN comes under the second category as it
is found only in the commentary. Even though it is not mentioned directly in
original verses of Charaka Samhita, the knowledge of SGN can be applied in
different contexts. For example, while stating Pratyatmaniyata Lakshana (cardinal
symptom) of a disease or for the pinpoint explanation of the subject. In
Ayurveda, many of the diseases possess similar signs and symptoms, out of which
the cardinal symptom is helpful for differential diagnosis. Similarly, when it
is advised to follow the wholesome diet and regimen in Jwara (fever),
patient will not understand what to do? However, if the physician advices to
take Shadanga Paniya (medicated water prepared from six drugs)
in fever which is a specific advice suitable in Jwara, this
satisfies the utilization of SGN.
SGN is mainly used in bifocal manner i.e.
positive and negative perspective. Among the above described 12 contexts, six
are in positive aspect and five are in negative aspect and in one context it
has been used in both ways. The details of various contexts indicating the
usage of SGN in different ways have been enlisted in [Table 2].
Table 2: Enlistment
of the contexts indicating the usage of Shringagrahika Nyaya in
different ways in Ayurveda Dipika commentary of Charaka Samhita.
After the thorough analysis of these 12 contexts,
it is observed that SGN has been quoted highest times in AD commentary [6] and is a little difficult maxim to understand for an
average Ayurvedic scholar as it is stated in two dimensions. SGN is used
positively not only for illustrative purpose but also to emphasize the
importance of certain points such as clinical essentiality of 50 Mahakashayas for
lower intellectuals; severity of Bhutonmada caused by
violence; importance of three substances, viz., oil, ghee and honey which
alleviates Vata, Pitta and Kapha respectively.
SGN is also used negatively as a rule to justify the context, prevent Tantra
Dosha (textual errors) and preserve Shastra Lakshana (qualities
of the best treatise).
Conclusion
The maxims are applied in Ayurvedic literature
like mathematical formulae to help in exploring the concealed concepts, facts
of the science and understand the original intention of the author. SGN has
been used by Chakrapani as a tool to decode the hidden meaning of various
verses in Charaka Samhita. It has been mainly used to avoid the two Tantra
Dosha (errors in treatises), i.e. Punarukti (repetition)
and Ativistara (unnecessary expansion of the text), ultimately
contributing in the precision and crisp presentation like that of an ideal
scientific text. It also highlights the important aspects of the subject in a
group of similar ones and can be applied to understand the underlying principle
in the narration of subject matter.
Hence, it necessitates the essentiality of SGN's knowledge for every scholar to get valid and authentic apprehension of Ayurvedic treatises, especially Charaka Samhita for better understanding as well as successful implementation of Ayurvedic concepts.
Financial Support and Sponsorship
NIL
Conflict of Interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References
Please refer to PDF file of article.
To
read article in PDF format.
About Authors: Rajkumar
Chinthala, Shubhangi
Kamble, AS
Baghel, N N L Bhagavathi
First three authors from Department of Basic
Principles, IPGT and RA, Gujarat Ayurved University, Jamnagar, Gujarat, India.
Last author is Health Supervisor, TSWRDCFW, Warangal (East), Telangana, India.
Article available online/offline on: AYU, Vol. 39, Issue 3,
July to September 2018, Page no.121-126, for more details please visit: www.ayujournal.org
Address
for correspondence: Dr Rajkumar Chinthala, Department of Basic Principles, IPGT and RA, Gujarat Ayurved
University, Jamnagar, Gujarat, India.
No part of this article may be reproduced in full or part without written permission of the Ayu Journal who can be contacted at ayujournal@yahoo.com.