Launching  his campaign as the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) candidate in East Delhi  constituency, Rajmohan Gandhi, grandson of Mahatma Gandhi, attacked  Narendra Modi and demanded that he ‘come clean on his election  funding and subject himself to media scrutiny on his so-called  achievements’. Long an academic in the United States and well-known  on the capital’s ‘secular circuit’, Rajmohan Gandhi has never  been known for links with ‘Hindu’ causes, yet he was twice  handpicked by the Vatican to attend its inter-faith meetings at  Assisi.

The  meetings were part of the Vatican’s strategy to expand its  influence in synergy with the West’s political assault on the  Soviet Bloc and Orthodox Church and later on the Islamic world and  the People’s Republic of China. Pope Benedict XVI explained that  Pope John Paul II had called representatives of world religions to  Assisi in October 1986 because the division of the world in “two  mutually opposed blocs”, symbolized by the Berlin Wall, threatened  peace. However, he said, in 1989, just three years after Assisi, “the  wall came down, without bloodshed. Suddenly the vast arsenals that  stood behind the wall were no longer significant. They had lost their  terror.”

This  is an admission that the Vatican moves in tandem with the West’s  geo-strategic agenda. Pope John Paul II’s anti-Soviet role via the  Polish Solidarity movement is well known; suffice it to say that the  CIA and other front organisations poured millions of dollars into the  enterprise and the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991.

Today  the threat to world peace, according to Pope Benedict, is terrorism,  “We know that terrorism is often religiously motivated and that the  specifically religious character of the attacks is proposed as a  justification for the reckless cruelty that considers itself entitled  to discard the rules of morality for the sake of the intended ‘good’.  In this case, religion does not serve peace, but is used as  justification for violence.” This is a clear reference to Islam.  The Pope said the second threat is atheism, an obvious allusion to  China.

As  Rajmohan Gandhi was selected to attend both meetings, he must “come  clean” on his qualifications to represent Hindus at the Vatican and  endorse the civilisational conflict unleashed on the non-Christian  world. He is clearly part of an insidious anti-Hindu agenda and in  this light, his association with the heavily west-funded AAP  leadership cannot be accidental.

America’s  Ford Foundation, set up by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to  promote its interests all over the world, gives awards to carefully  selected opinion-makers, decision-makers, academics and activists to  build their social profile. Many leading lights of the AAP and its  original Lokpal movement are Ford Foundation-anointed.

Supreme  Court lawyer and AAP founding member Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay was  dismayed at the party leadership’s possible CIA links and wrote to  the Prime Minister and other leaders for a probe into the direct or  indirect funding of NGOs in India by foreign agencies. Upadhyay  further alleged that money decided the allotment of certain seats in  Uttar Pradesh, a charge also made in Punjab.

The  charges gained credibility after Aswathy Nair, social worker and AAP  candidate from Alappuzha, Kerala, alleged that she was offered  inducements to quit the seat. When moved to Kollam without her  consent, she quit. Nair alleged that she was offered money, “that  too from foreign countries… I was told by one Jackson Peter that I  will be offered a good amount for swapping the seat”. The AAP, she  added, is worse than some existing parties; there is no inner-party  democracy and all decisions are taken by a bunch of leaders.

Former  intelligence officer RSN Singh has done an exhaustive analysis of the  millions of dollars poured by Ford Foundation into Indian NGOs from  2002; the amounts given to NGOs controlled by Arvind Kejriwal and his  associates are staggering. That Kejriwal accepted such sums through  unregistered NGOs while in Government service indicates deep-seated  protection and as he has indulged in several coloured  revolution-style antics in the country, there is need to uncover his  unknown godfathers.

The  Government of India must also investigate the basis on which foreign  agencies engage in ‘head hunting’ in India and dish out the  Magsaysay and other awards to favoured wards. RSN Singh has also  traced the different routes by which Washington has pushed money into  India and into Kejriwal’s NGOs.

A  Dutch organisation funded by the Ford Foundation to pass money on to  third world countries including India has as its main purpose the  manipulation of media in South Asia. Observers have noted a  connection between a prominent business house spared by Kejriwal in  his anti-big business rants and huge advertisements given to  electronic television channels that played up the AAP and its leaders  in the run up to the Delhi Assembly poll.

Singh’s  research is based on a scrupulous study of the websites of all these  organisations, but a thorough investigation by intelligence agencies  is warranted to establish if Kejriwal’s amazing overnight  metamorphosis as a political leader in Delhi was not the result of  calibrated ‘seeding’ via his rich NGOs. Are the impressive crowds  that collect in several Indian cities looking for a new leader or are  they cleverly funded rent-a-crowds of the kind that overthrew the  Nepal monarchy? The matter is worthy of detailed investigation.

Until  the AAP core group’s habit of imposing decisions began to be  challenged, forcing the fall of the Delhi Government and later  causing the resignations of founder members, candidates, and others,  psephologist Yogendra Yadav exuded confidence that the party would  emerge as a credible substitute to established parties in the general  election. He argued that the poor, the scheduled castes, adivasis and  Muslims are seeking an alternative to the declining Congress and so  the AAP would confront the BJP and Narendra Modi frontally.

Yogendra  Yadav insisted that Kejriwal’s challenge to Narendra Modi in  Varanasi would not be ‘symbolic’ but would be a serious attempt  to defeat the BJP’s prime ministerial nominee. That is easier said  than done. Many voters are getting tired of Kejriwal’s stentorian  declamations and are wondering why AAP is targetting Narendra Modi  with so much hatred when he is not responsible for the corruption,  incompetence, and national decay of the past ten years. His silence  on Sonia Gandhi and the extra-constitutional National Advisory  Council (NAC) speaks volumes about his true allegiance.

First  published
1. The Pioneer, 25 March 2014 [Title: Khaas Aadmis Prop Up The Aam Aadmi Party
2. http://www.vijayvaani.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?aid=3147

Also see
1. Kashi
2. The People of Kashi
3. Dev Deepavali Festival Kashi
4. Sangam at Prayag