• Samkhya philosophical system is atheistic in its metaphysical framework but offers an understanding the divine that is far more nuanced than the simplistic atheism of Buddhism. Dr. Radhakrishnan revealed that Buddhism's noble truths were but echoes of Samkhya's original wisdom.

Introduction

In the rich tapestry of Bharatiya philosophical traditions, Sankhya stands as a luminous thread, woven from the very fabric of the land that has given birth to countless Bhagavans and sages.

This ancient system of thought, although atheistic in its metaphysical framework, is deeply rooted in the profound understanding of the divine that permeates the Bharatiya worldview. In contrast, Buddhism, while also originating from the Indian subcontinent, presents a philosophy that, while profound in its own right, lacks the depth and complexity of the Sankhya system.

To truly appreciate the magnificence of Sankhya and its relationship to the Bharatiya experience of divinity, we must first cast a critical eye upon the Western scholars who have used Buddhism as a means to further their own political and ideological agendas, while dismissing the profound insights offered by the Sankhya system and its theistic interpretations, such as the Bhagavad Gita.

Sankhya: A Profound Philosophical Framework

Sankhya, one of the six orthodox schools of Indian philosophy, presents a dualistic framework that divides reality into two eternal principles: Purusha (consciousness) and Prakriti (nature). This elegant system provides a comprehensive understanding of the material world and its evolutes, the Mahabhutas (five elements), without the need for a divine creator. Yet, the absence of a creator deity in Sankhya does not diminish the profound experiential nature of this system, which invites the practitioner to delve deep into the mysteries of the self and the universe [1].

The Sankhya framework, with its acknowledgment of the plurality of Purushas and the inherent intelligence of Prakriti, provides a foundation for understanding the divine that is far more nuanced and profound than the simplistic atheism of Buddhism.

Buddhism: A Limited Philosophical Perspective

Buddhism, born from the teachings of the Buddha, presents a philosophical perspective that, while significant in its own right, lacks the depth and complexity of the Sankhya system.

The core doctrines of Buddhism – Anatta (no-self), Anicca (impermanence), and Dukkha (suffering) – form the bedrock of this tradition, which rejects the existence of a permanent soul or creator god [2]. 

While the Buddha's emphasis on personal liberation through the Eightfold Path is commendable, it fails to acknowledge the profound experiential nature of the divine that is so central to the Bharatiya worldview. The Buddhist focus on Sunyata (emptiness) and the impermanence of all phenomena, while philosophically interesting, ultimately presents a limited understanding of the nature of reality and the self.

The Profound Insights of Sankhya

The Sankhya system, with its acknowledgment of multiple realities and levels of existence, offers a framework for understanding the divine that is far more nuanced and profound than the simplistic atheism of Buddhism. By positing the existence of Purusha as eternal and separate from Prakriti, Sankhya allows for a deeper exploration of the nature of consciousness and its relationship to the material world [3].

This understanding of the self and reality, rooted in the Bharatiya worldview, provides a foundation for the profound experiential encounter with the divine that is so central to the Dharmic traditions.

The Bhagavad Gita: A Theistic Interpretation of Sankhya

The Bhagavad Gita, a revered text in the Hindu tradition, presents a unique integration of Sankhya principles with theistic devotion. In this sacred dialogue, Krishna, as an avatar of Bhagavan, explains the relationship between the self and the divine using the framework of Sankhya. The Gita presents Bhagavan as both immanent and transcendent within nature, permeating the very fabric of Prakriti [4].

This theistic interpretation of Sankhya, while dismissed by some Western scholars as a corruption of the original atheistic system, in fact represents a profound understanding of the divine that is deeply rooted in the Bharatiya worldview. The Gita's integration of Sankhya principles with theistic devotion serves as a powerful reminder of the depth and complexity of the Bharatiya philosophical tradition.

The Western Misappropriation of Buddhism

In recent years, some Western scholars have used Buddhism as a means to further their own political and ideological agendas, while dismissing the profound insights offered by the Sankhya system and its theistic interpretations. These scholars, often motivated by a desire to promote a secular, rationalist worldview, have latched onto Buddhism as a philosophy that is supposedly more compatible with modern Western values [5].

However, this selective appropriation of Buddhist ideas ignores the deep roots of Buddhism within the Bharatiya philosophical tradition and fails to acknowledge the profound experiential nature of the divine that is so central to the Dharmic worldview. By dismissing the theistic interpretations of Sankhya, such as the Bhagavad Gita, these scholars reveal their own cultural and ideological biases, which prevent them from truly understanding the depth and complexity of the Bharatiya philosophical tradition.

Conclusion

Sankhya, as a profound philosophical system rooted in the Bharatiya worldview, offers a framework for understanding the divine that is far more nuanced and complex than the simplistic atheism of Buddhism. While Buddhism presents a significant philosophical perspective in its own right, it ultimately lacks the depth and experiential richness of the Sankhya system. The theistic interpretations of Sankhya, such as the Bhagavad Gita, serve as a powerful reminder of the profound understanding of the divine that permeates the Bharatiya philosophical tradition.

By casting a critical eye upon the Western scholars who have misappropriated Buddhist ideas to further their own ideological agendas, we can begin to appreciate the true magnificence of the Sankhya system and its relationship to the Bharatiya experience of divinity.

As we delve deeper into the mysteries of consciousness and the nature of reality, let us turn to the profound insights offered by Sankhya, and let us embrace the experiential richness of the Bharatiya worldview, which recognizes the divine as both immanent and transcendent within the very fabric of existence.

In the hallowed pages of "Indian Philosophy" (1923), penned when Dr. Radhakrishnan walked the corridors of Calcutta University, he revealed how Buddhism's noble truths were but echoes of Samkhya's original wisdom. The profound four-fold framework that Sage Kapila had already crystallized in the Samkhyapravacanabhasya – from the recognition of suffering, to the path of liberation, through the subtle understanding of prakrti and purusha, to the supreme discriminating wisdom – would later find a simplified reflection in Buddhist teachings.

Time's ancient scroll reveals that Kapila, the master architect of Samkhya's sophisticated metaphysics, established these profound truths generations before Buddhism emerged. When the Buddha began sharing his dharma, he was walking on philosophical ground already illuminated by Samkhya's penetrating insights. 

While both rejected empty rituals, Kapila's system offered a more nuanced understanding of reality's fundamental nature, presenting liberation not just as freedom from suffering, but as the ultimate discrimination between consciousness and materiality – a depth of insight that transcended later Buddhist interpretations.

Author Sri Prabhav Paturi is a Business Strategist and Executive Coach, renowned for developing the Vedic Psychology modality. Ordained by his Guru Parampara, he leads Vyoma Bindu Akhada, spreading Hindu Dharma through Aghora Tantra and Yoga, while offering free spiritual guidance. In addition, he collaborates with companies like Blue Capuchin, Brahman Studios, and Manoloka Holistic Wellness Clinic. Passionate about blending ancient wisdom with modern solutions, he aims to create a sustainable ecosystem where Dharma and modernity coexist.

References

[1] Larson, G. J. (1979). Classical Sāṃkhya: An interpretation of its history and meaning. Motilal Banarsidass Publishers. 

[2] Harvey, P. (2013). An introduction to Buddhism: Teachings, history and practices. Cambridge University Press. 

[3] Reat, N. R. (1990). The origins of Indian psychology. Asian Humanities Press. 

[4] Sargeant, W. (2009). The Bhagavad Gita. State University of New York Press. 

[5] McMahan, D. L. (2008). The making of Buddhist modernism. Oxford University Press.

To read all articles by author

Also read

1. Six systems of Indian Philosophy by Pt Rajmani Tugnait

2. What is the concept of God in Christianity and Sanatana Dharma

3. Atheism is a non issue in Sanatana Dharma

4. Characteristics of Indian Philosophy

5. Lord Indra in Buddhism

6. Commentary on the Bhagavad Gita