- Women
are invariably portrayed, now days, in the Ramayana using contemporary and
probably colonial mind sets. The author uses examples from Valimiki’s Ramayana
to state that women were free to express their views and accorded an important
status.
There
are innumerable versions of the Ramayana and myriad interpretations of these
versions across India and other countries. Many of these popular versions, both
in text form and depictions on stage and television, have created strong
impressions of most of the principal characters of the epic among people. Even
some of the minor characters and their stories evoke vivid imagery in our minds
and we tend to paint rather stereotypical sketches of their personalities that
we have over time come to believe and accept as definitive.
In
the light of these numerous versions, a study of the original composition by
Sage Valmiki gives refreshingly different perspectives about many aspects of
the story and the characters. What is striking is that these characters – major
and minor ones – are far from the often one-dimensional depictions that they are subjected to and are
able to hold their own ground, giving momentum and direction to the turn of
events constituting Shri Rama’s epic journey.
The
description of some of the well-known events by Sage Valmiki is not only
surprising in the way these are presented but also clearly bring out the finer nuances of the
characters and their interpersonal dynamics along with the attendant
socio-political framework.
Ramayana
is not generally talked about in the context of women’s empowerment and many
instances in the epic are typically viewed through the prism of patriarchy.
However, Valmiki presents a rather contrarian picture and a few instances
described in Ayodhyakaanda and Aranyakaanda provide illuminating
perspectives about the status and influence of women.
Let
us take two such interesting instances that present entirely different
perspectives compared to what is ordinarily assumed or understood.
Firstly,
despite being selfish and unjust in nature, Kaikeyi’s wishes were upheld by
both Emperor Dasharatha and Rama, who very strongly emphasised the need to
fulfill the promises made to her, irrespective of the consequences. After all
these boons were granted to her by Dasharatha as a reward for the help she
rendered to him during war.
But
what is even more remarkable is another episode in this context with reference
to Sita.
When
Rama is exiled and is about to leave Ayodhya with Sita, the royal preceptor,
Sage Vasishtha angrily chastises Queen Kaikeyi saying that she had exceeded all
limits of decency and her behaviour did not conform to the standards (of
righteousness) and says the following:
न गन्तव्यं वनं देव्या सीतया शीलवर्जिते।
अनुष्ठास्यति रामस्य सीता प्रकृतमासनम्।।2.37.23।।
“O
woman dead to (all) decorum! Princess Sita shall not proceed to the forest.
Remaining
here she will occupy the throne which was offered to Rama.” (Source: Srimad
Valmiki Ramayana, Gita Press, Gorakhpur publication)
Sage
Vasishtha goes on to further add:
आत्मा हि दारास्सर्वेषां दारसङ्ग्रहवर्तिनाम्।
आत्मेयमिति रामस्य पालयिष्यति मेदिनीम्।।2.37.24।।
“A
wife is the very self to all householders. As the (other) self of Rama, she
will rule over the globe.” (Source: Srimad
Valmiki Ramayana, Gita Press, Gorakhpur publication)
Coming
from Sage Vasishtha, these were strong statements and made with considerable
authority. Both royalty and society were therefore, open to the idea of Sita
occupying the throne, should she have wished to do so. Moreover, this also
meant Sita would have had the training to be crowned the ruler, as this was an
important prerequisite even for the male heirs to the throne.
Cover image of Valmiki Ramayan, Gita Press Gorakpur.
Surely
Sita chooses to follow Rama into the forest. Sage Valmiki beautifully
summarises her influence over all the subsequent events of the Ramayana through
the thoughts of Hanuman described in the Sundarakanda,
when he perceives Sita for the very first time.
Hanuman says to himself that it was
indeed for this Sita that fourteen thousand demons of Janasthana along with
their commanders, Khara, Trishira and Dushana, were killed by Rama and so was
the demon Viraadha. For her sake Kabandha was killed and subsequently, Vaali
too was killed by Rama. It was because of her that Sugriva attained the throne
of Kishkindha and the ruler ship of all the Vaanaras. And she alone was the
cause of his own leap across the ocean and arrival at Lanka. (Source:
Summarised reproduction of Slokas 7-12 of the Sixteenth Chapter of Sundarakanda
of Srimad Valmiki Ramayana, Gita Press, Gorakhpur publication)
The
ultimate destruction and killing of Ravana and his forces at the hands of Rama
was brought about by Sita.
In
Aranyakanda, Valmiki highlights another interesting aspect – that of
women, especially those belonging to royal lineages- of being well-versed in
the Shaastras including statecraft and governance.
The
instance connected with Surpanakha is very interesting and provides food for
thought.
Surpanakha,
is usually portrayed in popular media as a rakshasa-woman of terrible
appearance, who complains to Ravana about how she was badly treated by Rama and
Lakshmana and instigates him to abduct Sita to avenge her humiliation by the
two princes.
While
she does instigate Ravana to kidnap Sita, what is very interesting in Valmiki
Ramayana is the manner in which she convinces him to do so. It is not merely an
emotional appeal by a sister made to her brother. The arguments she presents
reflect a deep knowledge of statecraft and administration. What is even more
noteworthy is that she chides Ravana about his ‘inaction’ in response to the
threat posed by Rama, in front of all his ministers and counsellors very boldly
and without mincing words!
An
entire chapter of the Aranyakanda (Ch. 33) is dedicated to her speech to
Ravana, which centers upon the duties and responsibilities of a monarch and the
nuances of managing law and order and the security of his territories.
Speaking
about the responsibilities of a ruler, she says that a monarch who does not
personally attend to his affairs gets ruined without doubt, along with his kingdom
as well as those affairs. Narrating the plight of an inept ruler, she says that
just as elephants keep away from a muddy river, people will keep distance from a
king who does not employ spies, does not give audience to his people and is not
independent. She further adds that those rulers of
men who do not reclaim a territory, which is no longer under their control, do
not shine through prosperity any more than mountains submerged in an ocean. (Source: Summarised reproduction
of Slokas 4-6 of the Thirty-third Chapter of Aranyakanda [Srimad
Valmiki Ramayana, Gita Press, Gorakhpur publication & Sloka
& Translation | Valmiki Ramayanam (iitk.ac.in))
This
line of reasoning cannot be from one who does not understand governance or who
does not have prior experience in debating and discussing such topics.
Surpanakha
also nonchalantly questions Ravana’s ability to continue as king saying:
त्वन्तु बालस्वभावश्च बुद्धिहीनश्च राक्षस।
ज्ञातव्यन्तु न जानीषे कथं राजा भविष्यसि।।3.33.8।।
“You are undoubtedly
childish of disposition and devoid of intelligence and do not know what ought
to be known, O demon! How (then) will you continue to be a king?” (Source: Srimad
Valmiki Ramayana, Gita Press, Gorakhpur publication)
Driving home her point she then enumerates what a ruler should
guard against and how he must act. She calls a king dislodged from his kingdom
worthless, even if he is capable, like a piece of cloth that is worn and
discarded and similar to garlands that are used and crushed.
About the qualities
of a respected ruler, she says that the king who is vigilant, knows everything
(about himself and his enemy), whose senses are fully controlled, who
recognises the services of others and is pious by disposition continues on his
throne for long. She adds that the king, who remains prudent and whose frown
and favour are manifest in the form of punishment and reward, is honoured by
the people. (Source: Summarised reproduction
of Slokas 19-21 of the Thirty-third Chapter of Aranyakanda [Srimad
Valmiki Ramayana, Gita Press, Gorakhpur publication & Sloka & Translation | Valmiki Ramayanam (iitk.ac.in))
Surpanakha finally admonishes Ravana severely saying that he was utterly deprived of all these virtues and warned him that he would lose his sovereignty and perish soon if he continued to ignore the realities of the situation they were faced with. For his part, Ravana does reflect upon her words quietly before questioning her further about the events preceding her arrival at his court.
It is quite a fascinating account given that even in a society
(such as that of the rakshasas), where ‘might was right’, Surpanakha could
express herself frankly and publicly and hold her own in front of Ravana, her
all-powerful brother and king. That Sage Valmiki chose to present even a
character like Surpanakha, who has a relatively fleeting albeit impactful
presence in the epic, with so much depth speaks volumes about why Ramayana
resonates across the subcontinent and around the world, among all sections of
society.
Even as later versions of the Ramayana may have inadvertently
incorporated the impact of socio-political influences of their times (i.e., when
they were composed) as regards the status of women in the story, the societies
depicted by Sage Valmiki in his Ramayana – be it those of humans, vanaras or
even rakshasas – had strong women influencing the course of events, having
their say and also providing useful counsel to the menfolk.
Far from a one-dimensional perspective, he has presented the
epic in a way that demands a more layered understanding of the events and the
characters. Trying to compartmentalize the characters and their roles into
pre-defined narratives and opinions can be very misleading, while taking away
from the essence of the itihaasa.
To read all
articles by author
Also
read
1. Five
Elemental Women
2. Queen
Abakka who defeated the Portuguese at sea
3. Why
Ahilyabai Holkar is a great woman
4. Three
Generation of Indian Women Violinists